2008/015 svccfg refresh subcommand

[Jeremy Harris]

Nicolas Williams wrote:
> I like the refresh/restart split.
> 
> Refresh implies that running service state/config can be updated without
> disruption.  Restart implies that processes will exit/be killed and be
> restarted.  The distinction makes a difference in terms of reliability.

It sounds like it behaves much as a "service foo reload" in RedHat.
Was any thought given to using the same word for the subcommand?
Is it too late to change?  Or accept a synonym?

Cheers,
   Jeremy