PSARC 2008/406 Objective Caml System and LablGTK

[Frank Che]

Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Given there is no source or binary compatibility I think this would be 
> a correct and accurate use of Volatile.  For such a low stability 
> guarantee even Uncommitted is to high as that would mean you couldn't 
> update OCaml compiler at all in a micro/patch release.
>
Sounds good. I have marked those interfaces as Volatile except those 2 
SUNW package names, which were marked as 'Uncommitted'. Updated case 
material was saved in the case directory as 'spec.txt'

Thanks,
Frank.