2008/403 [libc printf behaviour for NULL string]

[Darren J Moffat]

Joseph Kowalski wrote:
> Darren (several timezones removed),
> 
> When you get through this tread, I need your position (as submitter) on 
> the proposed binding of Patch.  From there, I can decide what to do with 
> this case.

Patch was on purpose because while I have no intention of backporting 
this to Solaris 10 I see only goodness in allowing it.

However I could be convinced to restrict the binding to be Minor but not 
Major.

-- 
Darren J Moffat