[brussels-dev] Brussels: NDD compatiblity support [PSARC/2008/171 FastTrack timeout 03/11/2008]

[Peter Memishian]

 > > Seems fine to me.  Regarding the `name' parameter to
 > > mac_register_priv_prop(): I presume the caller will not provide the `_',
 > 
 > Yes. the driver will be written to be consistent with dladm's
 > private property expectations. the mac_ndd shim will add/delete
 > the "_" to deal with ND_SET/ND_GET ioctls.

I see.

So will dladm be able to interact with these properties?  Based on some of
the earlier emails in this thread, it seemed like you felt that was
unnecessary (and I tend to agree), but I don't see anything in the spec
that prevents it.  Maybe a MAC_NDD_PROP flag to mac_register_priv_prop()?

-- 
meem