2008/159 svcs -xq

[Nicolas Williams]

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:01:14PM -0600, Mark Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com>
> wrote:
> > My objection was, admittedly, weak.  IIRC I conceded that when I made
> > it.
> 
> I'd rather keep the simple errorlevel semantic:  0 = svcs -x prints nothing,
> 3 = svcs -x prints something.
> 
> Getting svcs -x to squawk more about degraded services should be another
> case.
> 
> Besides, I'd rather see the priority on common config storage upgraded
> (although I lack the fortitude to tell anyone here to get stuffed).

Better learn quick!  :)

OK, so, Liane: here's your chance -last chance-  to tell me to stuff it :)