ZFS Boot Support Binding Change [PSARC/2008/301 Self Review]

[Bart Smaalders]

Mark A. Carlson wrote:
> Right. If ZFS was claiming that it was *not* going for POSIX compliance, 
> then
> we would have an architectural issue.
> 
> I see this as advice to the C-Team to not allow integration until the bugs
> are fixed.
> 

I suggest that this issue is more complicated that "just obey the standard",
and that preventing ZFS root support from going into S10 because of this
issue is mis-guided, to say the least.

- Bart


-- 
Bart Smaalders			Solaris Kernel Performance
barts at cyber.eng.sun.com		http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."