EOF of gnome-sys-suspend [LSARC/2008/669 FastTrack timeout 11/11/2008]
Jedy Wang
Jedy.Wang at sun.com
Sun Nov 2 18:48:31 PST 2008
Hi James,
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 09:51 -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Brian Cameron writes:
> > ----------------------------- ----------- -----------------
> > /usr/bin/gnome-sys-suspend Obsolete GUI
> > Volatile
>
> The man page for gnome-sys-suspend says nothing about this being a
> Volatile interface -- there appear to be no warnings at all -- and it
> looks like there are options there that could reasonably be invoked by
> users or by scripts.
That's interesting. But on nv b101, "man gnome-sys-suspend" gave me:
ATTRIBUTES
See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following
attributes:
____________________________________________________________
|_______ATTRIBUTE_TYPE________|_______ATTRIBUTE_VALUE_______|
|_Availability________________|_SUNWgnome-sys-suspend_______|
|_Interface_stability_________|_Volatile____________________|
>
> If the binary goes away, what's the compatibility story?
And copy the following section from Randy Fishel's mail.
"However, the PM teams are working on a proposal for a library and
cli's which would provide the committed API's to be used for power
management control (and for things like GPM and/or HAL to consume)
which would make /usr/openwin/bin/sys-syspend obsolete. That is not
part of this case, but is made for reference."
Regards,
Jedy
>
> > /usr/lib/gnome-suspend Obsolete binary to perform
> > Project suspend
> > Private
> > /usr/share/man/man1/gnome-sys-suspend.1
> > Obsolete man page
> > Volatile
> > SUNWgnome-sys-suspend Uncommitted appropriate components
> > Family of SVr4 packages removed
>
>
> What about /etc/default/sys-suspend and the "Syssuspend*" family of X
> resources?
>
More information about the opensolaris-arc
mailing list