PSARC/2008/549 - Apache Standard C++ Library

[Steve Clamage]

Other issues have come to light since I wrote that email.

What about the the headers for the Apache library? What about Solaris 10?

---
Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage at sun.com

On 9/7/2008 8:44 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> 
> 
> Steve Clamage wrote:
>> On 9/6/2008 12:33 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
>>> Steve Clamage and myself had reached an agreement on this, a couple 
>>> of days ago:
>>>
>>> 1. We [ SFW/KDE ] were going to introduce this library in 
>>> Nevada/OpenSolaris -- it's the easiest integration, and it's the one 
>>> we care most about, because it can be done *now*.
>>> 2. They [ DevPro/Tools ] were going to introduce this library with 
>>> the compiler(s), for Solaris 9/10, at some point in the future. I 
>>> cannot say when that will be.
>>>
>>> Is this agreement still valid ? Or has it been filibustered ?
>>
>> I don't remember agreeing to SFW/KDE introducing the library into 
>> SNV/OpenSolaris, at least not in the form of the original proposal.
> 
> 
> Return-Path: <Stephen.Clamage at Sun.COM>
> Received: from dm-eng-01.sfbay.sun.com (dm-eng-01.SFBay.Sun.COM 
> [129.145.155.198])
>         by jurassic-x4600.sfbay.sun.com (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP 
> id m84G6JtH022178
>         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 
> verify=NO)
>         for <steleman at jurassic-x4600.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 
> 09:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM 
> [192.18.43.133])
>         by dm-eng-01.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with 
> ESMTP id m84G6Jot001323
>         for <steleman at jurassic-x4600.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 
> 09:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129])
>         by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id 
> m84G6ED3008515
>         for <steleman at jurassic-x4600.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 
> 09:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com
>  (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
>  id <0K6O00C01HM0JY00 at fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>
>  (original mail from Stephen.Clamage at Sun.COM)
>  for steleman at jurassic-x4600.eng.sun.com (ORCPT Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM); 
> Thu,
>  04 Sep 2008 09:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from [129.146.86.208] by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com
>  (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007))
>  with ESMTPSA id <0K6O000HMI2905F0 at fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for
>  steleman at jurassic-x4600.eng.sun.com (ORCPT Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM); Thu,
>  04 Sep 2008 09:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:06:09 -0700
> From: Steve Clamage <Stephen.Clamage at Sun.COM>
> Subject: Re: PSARC/2008/549 - Apache Standard C++ Library
> In-reply-to: <48C002D6.8070607 at Sun.COM>
> Sender: Stephen.Clamage at Sun.COM
> To: Stefan Teleman <Stefan.Teleman at Sun.COM>
> Cc: John.Fischer at Sun.COM, Garrett.Damore at Sun.COM,
>         Mukesh Kapoor <Mukesh.Kapoor at Sun.COM>
> Message-id: <48C00771.3020108 at sun.com>
> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> References: <1219697434.9503.162.camel at sr1-umpk-16> 
> <48B32BE5.7030506 at sun.com>
>  <48B33D48.5090202 at Sun.COM> <48B4362C.7070604 at sun.com>
>  <48B458DA.5050700 at Sun.COM> <48B47579.4070609 at sun.com>
>  <48B479EC.8070204 at Sun.COM> <48B48070.2000407 at Sun.Com> 
> <48B48963.30600 at Sun.COM>
>  <48B48E59.2000807 at sun.com> <48B4C3F7.5030003 at Sun.COM>
>  <48B4CCCA.7030002 at Sun.Com> <48B4DE3B.8040608 at sun.com>
>  <48B4E6DB.1040207 at Sun.Com> <48BED9A9.4030306 at Sun.Com>
>  <48BEDE7B.3070606 at sun.com> <48BEE796.2050402 at Sun.COM>
>  <48BEEDBF.7090201 at sun.com> <48BF1A80.6080700 at sun.com>
>  <48BF2650.2060200 at Sun.COM> <48BFFAC7.9060204 at sun.com>
>  <1220542021.19370.12.camel at sr1-umpk-16> <48C002D6.8070607 at Sun.COM>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080807)
> 
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>  > Now I understand how you got to where you are with this ARC case, and I
>  > think we may at last be on the same page.
>  >
>  > John Fischer suggested that the project could deliver libstdcxx.so into
>  > /usr/lib, until the compiler team is able to do it.
>  >
>  > How about this: a separate package SUNWstdcxx (are 10 letters allowed in
>  > a package name?) consisting of just the appropriate versions of
>  > libstdcxx.so. Your project delivers the package until the compiler team
>  > is ready, then responsibility for the package transfers to the compiler
>  > team. That way we don't have issues with the contents of package X
>  > transferred to package Y.
> 
> I understood the last paragraph to mean what i had stated in my earlier 
> email.
> 
> --Stefan
> 
> -----
> 
> On 09/04/08 08:46, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>> My team and I are looking into the technical issues involved in 
>> delivering the library seamlessly integrated into the compiler. (For 
>> example, whether we must deliver separate libraries for MT and non-MT 
>> programs.) We also need to get management buy-in for the increased 
>> scope of work.
>>
>> ---
>> Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage at sun.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> opensolaris-arc mailing list
>> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org
>