PSARC 2009/210 uname -c

[Darren J Moffat]

Sebastien Roy wrote:
> The mechanism by which the list is generated is Project Private, as are
> the interfaces that the uname -c option uses to obtain the list from the
> running OS.

Who will be credited if the original fix for the development train is 
backported as is to a sustaining release ?  The original RE of the bug 
or the RE (usually from RPE) who integrates into the sustaining gate ?

What mechanisms are provided for those people, that despite the brave 
new world of OpenSolaris, wish to remain anonymous ?

Do only those that do putbacks (ops pushes in hg lingo) get credit ?

Basic I have no problem with the interfaces being Project Private but I 
think the data population process needs to be documented somewhere.  I'm 
happy if that is not this case and needs to wait for 2010/210.

--
Darren J Moffat