Can someone look at case 2009/117 or 2009/118?
Mark Martin
storycrafter at gmail.com
Tue Feb 24 11:17:02 PST 2009
James Carlson wrote:
> Mark Martin writes:
>
>> It looks like the synchronization process is stuck around case 2009/118
>> httping. This case and others after it are not available on the
>> external web site.
>>
>
> There's nothing interesting about either of those cases.
>
> However, the sync process has been in dire straits for some time now,
> and was recently stressed by some Java-related cases that went through
> LSARC and that had _hundreds_ of javadoc-generated files in them.
>
> There are multiple problems here. One is that the transfer mechanism
> itself is a little shady. Another is that the opensolaris.org
> infrastructure itself is unsound when driven by scripts like this.
>
> I've been baby-sitting it for days now. It's getting better, but it's
> unclear when or if it will recover.
>
>
Thanks for taking a look at this, again.
Add the additional download times for all that newly generated HTML
containing all those case materials, and the site's usability has taken
a severe hit as well. That problem can only get worse over time with
the current layout (all that generated DHTML on the left pane).
I have suspected for some time that the only real benefit I can
personally bring to either ARC, aside from my casual foray into
internship duties is to act as a resource for rewriting tools. At the
moment, I'm personally constrained for time, or I'd try to lead a
requirements gathering effort. I know John Plocher's prior work in the
area would be a great starting point. Until my local spacetime expands,
I guess you're probably stuck with the babysitting chores and the
robustness of the site will still be variable.
Is anyone else interested in at least getting a requirements gathering
exercise started?
More information about the opensolaris-arc
mailing list