GNU Developer Collection [LSARC/2008/776 FastTrack timeout 01/07/2009]
George Vasick
George.Vasick at sun.com
Thu Jan 8 11:41:42 PST 2009
Rainer Orth wrote:
> Nicolas Williams writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 06:58:57PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> George Vasick writes:
>>>> Actually, we are proposing to to install binutils 2.19 in
>>>> /usr/compilers/binutils219. It will be a separate package and not
>>>> contained in /usr/compilers/gcc432.
>>> Again, my questions about the reasons for that haven't been answered yet:
>>>
>>> * Why /usr/compilers at all? We don't have /usr/webservers or
>>> /usr/databases.
>> I object to /usr/compilers also. Might I suggest /usr/lib/compilers
>> instead?
>
> Since this will contain version-specific bin directories which users are
> expected to add to their PATH, it shouldn't go below /usr/lib. Existing
> precedent would be /usr/gcc/4.3.
Normally, users would not need to add version specific directories to
their PATH, /usr/bin and /usr/gnu/bin would work just fine in the case
where only one version of gcc is installed.
George
>
> Rainer
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
More information about the opensolaris-arc
mailing list