ddi_strdup [PSARC/2009/015 Self Review]

[Darren Reed]

Christopher Horne wrote:
> ....
> 	These functions will be documented in a new man page,
> 	string(9F).  For consistency with string(3C), the new
> 	string(9F) man page will also subsume contents of strchr(9F),
> 	strcmp(9F), strspn(9F), and strlen(9F).
>   

Is there any particular reason why we aren't going to whole
way here and documenting the same functions on string(9F)
as we do with string(3C)? (i.e. why does strcpy(9f) need
to be separate, or did that just get missed in the writing of
this email?)

For completeness, can a draft copy of the proposed
string(9F) please be placed in the case directory?

Thanks,
Darren