PSARC 2008/443 Driver for LSI MPT2.0 compliant SAS 2.0 controller
Garrett D'Amore
gdamore at sun.com
Tue Jul 7 08:57:01 PDT 2009
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Frank Che wrote:
>>> The project team would like to change the release binding of this
>>> project from micro to patch, for back-porting purpose. If there is
>>> any concern on this, please let the project team know.
>>>
>>> I think this change is qualified for self review. If there is
>>> concern, I can upgrade it to a fast track.
>>
>> I think since you requested micro binding originally, this is
>> trivially obvious. Indeed, I think many people these days treat
>> micro binding as synonymous with patch binding. (We haven't had a
>> "micro" release since Solaris 2.5.1.)
>>
>> For C-Team's point of view, I think you can just go ahead and proceed
>> as if you originally requested patch binding.
>
> There is a very important difference between micro and patch though
> and that is the delivery mechanism. A micro release can be assumed to
> be fresh installer or upgraded to but a patch release could need the
> feature applied by 'patchadd' as well as being upgraded to in a fresh
> bitted release. This case introduces a new package (SUNWmptsas) so as
> long as that can be properly dealt with in the patch release train I
> have no problem with the change of binding.
>
C-Team is apparently confused... while the driver is intended for the
feature-patch gate (i.e. for delivery as part of a Solaris 10 update),
they have made a point of requesting the project go back and ask for
patch binding.
> Also for drivers in particular the difference between micro and patch
> can be important if the device is needed as a boot device (which I
> assume would be the case for some hardware with the driver form this
> case).
>
I'm not sure that the distinction matters that much in practice.
- Garrett
More information about the opensolaris-arc
mailing list