Introducing non-persistent property group fastreboot_disable_np [PSARC/2009/338 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2009]

[James Carlson]

Scott Rotondo writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Scott Rotondo writes:
> >> Assuming that identifier length isn't a significant constraint, you 
> >> could spell out "transient" instead of using "np." But I think Jim's 
> >> suggestion above, which doesn't require any suffix, is a more natural 
> >> way to express this idea.
> > 
> > The two are actually separate issues.  I should have made that
> > clearer.
> > 
> > If there's a convenience function, then it'll still need a name and
> > (as a tiny nit only) I think avoiding "_np" might be a good idea.
> 
> Thanks for clarifying that. I thought fastreboot_disable_np was the 
> proposed name for the property group.

It is, but (a) I care much less about _np outside of the library
function interface context and (b) the name of the property group
doesn't matter until the semantics are nailed down.  ;-}

The _np nit was on the scf_fastreboot_disable_np() convenience function.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677