2009/174 VERY SHORT TIMEOUT smbfs mount permissions

[Nicolas Williams]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 01:04:10PM -0400, Gordon Ross wrote:
> 
> > Also, why should dirperms default to 755 instead of 700?
> 
> They're not.  The default dirperms are derived from whatever
> turns out to be the fileperms setting, plus X bits.  i.e.
> if the user specifies fileperms=640, the default dirperms
> will be 750.  If they don't specify either one, the default
> dirperms will be 700.
> 
> Again, that part of the functionality is not changed by
> this proposal.

Ah, thanks.