PSARC 2009/039 prefetch interfaces
James Carlson
james.d.carlson at sun.com
Tue Mar 17 14:41:13 PDT 2009
Garrett D'Amore writes:
> I have to apologize to Paul here, but I neglected to update the IAM file
> to indicate that this is a fast track, so I don't think the "litany" was
> ever run on this case. I'm updating the IAM file now, and I'm pushing
> the timeout on this to next Wednesday.
>
> However, I believe that all the material concerns were addressed in the
> case history by Paul already, and I don't see why this case can't be
> approved tomorrow. Can I get a +1 from a member? :-)
Can we have a summary of the proposal? I *think* we currently have
Consolidation Private stability (within ON) and Patch/Micro release
binding for:
void prefetch_read_once(void *)
void prefetch_read_many(void *)
void prefetch_wrote_once(void *)
void prefetch_write_many(void *)
(With the odd write/wrote distinction and with the arguments not
const'd the way I would ordinarily have expected.)
Is this it?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
More information about the opensolaris-arc
mailing list