+1 on LSARC/2009/166 (EOF of BDB 4.2)?

Margot Miller margot.miller at sun.com
Mon Mar 23 11:41:16 PDT 2009


+1

My only concern would be the migration/upgrade of
customer data, but that looks like it is being addressed.

Thanks
Margot


John Fischer wrote:
> All,
>
> I still have an empty mail log for the EOL of BDB 4.2 thus
> need a +1.
>
> We (LSARC) approved BDB 4.7 in (2008/570).  That case included
> a migration tool from BDB 4.2 to BDB 4.7.  This case deprecates
> the interfaces of BDB 4.2 in a Patch release of Solaris (i.e.,
> Solaris 10 Update) and removes them in a Minor release of Solaris
> (i.e., Solaris Nevada).  The case will provide the necessary
> documentation for the Patch release of Solaris.  The case directory
> shows the package map entries after BDB 4.2 is removed.
>
> I have attached the project proposal to this email for your convience.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Template Version: @(#)onepager.txt 1.35 07/11/07 SMI
> Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems
>
> 1. Introduction
>    1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
>         EOL of Berkeley DB 4.2 in Solaris.
>
>    1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
> 	Karen Langford
>
>    1.3. Date of This Document:
> 	03/05/09
> 	
>    1.4. Name of Major Document Customer(s)/Consumer(s):
> 	1.4.1. The PAC or CPT you expect to review your project:
> 		
>             Database PAC
>
> 	1.4.2. The ARC(s) you expect to review your project:
>
>             LSARC
>
> 	1.4.3. The Director/VP who is "Sponsoring" this project:
>
>             Jeffrey.Pugh at sun.com
>
> 	1.4.4. The name of your business unit:
>
>             Software
>
>    1.5. Email Aliases:
>     	1.5.1. Responsible Manager: Lars.Heill at sun.com
>     	1.5.2. Responsible Engineer: Karen.Langford at sun.com
>     	1.5.3. Marketing Manager: Rebecca.Hansen at sun.com
> 	1.5.4. Interest List: sleepycat-productgroup-users at sun.com
>
> 2. Project Summary
>
>    2.1. Project Description:
>
> 	The Berkeley DB (BDB) 4.2 release was approved by ARC back in
> 	2003 and integrated into Nevada and Solaris in 2007.
>
>         In 2008 the latest release of Berkeley DB 4.7 was approved 
> 	by ARC and integrated into Nevada along with the old 4.2 release. 
>
> 	This project proposes the EOL and removal of the 4.2 release from 
> 	Nevada.
>
>
>    2.2. Previous relevant ARC cases
>
>         LSARC/2003/585 BDB 4.2 - Integrated into Solaris 10 and Nevada
>         LSARC/2008/570 BDB 4.7 - Integrated along with BDB 4.2 into Nevada
>
> 	Note BDB 4.2 is not in OpenSolaris, neither is 4.7.
>
>    2.3. Risks and Assumptions:
>
>         As we propose to leave 4.2 in the Solaris Updates we see no risks
> 	there. We will commit to delivering critical bug fixes for the duration 
> 	of the Update's Active Service Life.
>
> 	We also see no risk in regards to removing 4.2 from Nevada as S11 has 
> 	not been offically released. We contacted our sole Nevada customer, 
> 	Evolution, and they confirmed that they have upgraded their product 
>         to use 4.7.
>
>   
> 3. Business Summary
>
>    3.1. Problem Area:
> 	
>         As mentioned above we foresee no problems with removing 4.2 from Nevada.
>
>    3.2. Market/Requester:
> 	
> 	Database Technology Group.
>
>         This was recommended in the discussions around the ARC case for
>         BDB 4.7 (LSARC/2008/570).
>
>    3.3. Business Justification:
>
>         We want to reduce the amount of resources needed to sustain the old 4.2 
> 	release in the future.  
>
>    3.4. Competitive Analysis:
> 	
>         N/A
>
>    3.5. Opportunity Window/Exposure:
> 	
>         We want to remove 4.2 from Nevada before FCS in 2010.
>
> 	We also want to include the EOF announcement in the S10U7 release notes. 
> 	Deadline is March 30, 08.
>
>
>    3.6. How will you know when you are done?:
>    	
>         When 4.2 has been removed from the ONNV consolidation.
>
>
> 4. Technical Description:
>
>    4.1. Details:
>
>         This project will remove the 4.2 software from the following packages
>  	delivered to Nevada:
>
> 	SUNWbdb - Berkeley DB for C/C++ applications
>         SUNWbdbj - Berkeley DB for Java applications
>       
>
>    4.2. Bug/RFE Number(s):
> 	
>         6813821   
>   
>    4.3. Doc Impact:
>
> 	We will announce the EOL of 4.2 in S10U7 release notes.
>     
>    4.4. Admin/Config Impact:
>
>         None.
>     
>    4.5. HA Impact:
>
>         N/A
>     
>    4.6. I18N/L10N Impact:
>
>         No.
>     
>    4.7. Packaging & Delivery:  
>
>         SUNWbdb - Berkeley DB for C/C++ applications
>         SUNWbdbj - Berkeley DB for Java applications
>
>  
>         4.7.1. Packages:
>
> 	Cluster id: SUNWCbdb
> 	Metaclusters: SUNWCXall, SUNWCall, SUNWCprog, SUNWCuser, SUNWreq
> 	Cluster name: BerkeleyDB-Base 
> 	Packages: SUNWbdb, SUNWbdbj
>
>
>         4.7.2. Package Layout
>
>         For both the Solaris updates and Nevada, BDB 4.2 is currently installed under:
>         /usr/lib/bdb     - c utilities
>         /usr/lib         - libraries (versioned ie: libdb.so.1, libdb_java.so.1)
>         /usr/share       - db.jar
>
>         In Nevada, BDB 4.7 is delivered under: 
>         /usr/lib/bdb47   - c utilities
>         /usr/lib         - libraries (versioned ie: libdb.so.5, libdb_java.so.5)
>         /usr/share/bdb47 - db.jar
>
>  
> 	4.7.3. Proposed change for Nevada delivery
>
> 	We will update both packages, removing the 4.2 software prior to integrating 
>         into Nevada. See [1] for new package layout.
>
>
>    4.8. Upgrading
>
> 	Nevada customers using 4.2 must upgrade their products to use 4.7. As
> 	mentioned above, Evolution, our sole customer, has already upgraded their 
> 	product.
>
> 	The topic of upgrading from 4.2 to 4.7 was discussed in LSARC 2008/570, 
> 	below is the relevant section from that case:       
>   
>         "The BDB software does not automatically inform applications that a new 
> 	release is available. The decision to upgrade must be made by the customer. 
> 	Existing applications will continue to access the old library (4.2) until 
> 	the user performs the manual steps required to upgrade which include 
> 	linking to the new library and recompiling. 
>
>         Before performing an upgrade customers must backup their database and
>         log files. 
>
>         The upgrade process for the Berkeley database requires that customers
>         perform a number of manual steps. These steps are clearly documented
>         in Chapter 31 of BDB's Reference manual and must be followed by the customer. 
>         http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/toc.html
>
>         The Berkeley database does provided a db_upgrade utility which must be
>         used as part of the upgrade procedure.
>
>         The 4.7 release introduces a number of modifications to existing APIs 
>         in the form of method name changes, and new parameters. These 
> 	incompatibilities with the previous release may be transparent to a 
> 	customer's application, depending on how the application is coded. 
>
>         An example of an API change in moving from 4.2 to 4.7: DB Cursor APIs 
>         were renamed from (for example) dbc->c_close() to dbc->close(). All code 
>         referencing these APIs would have to be updated. 
>
>         As part of the upgrade procedure each customer must determine whether 
>         their application requires modification based on changes introduced by 4.7.
>         Again, this information is available in BDB's reference manual."
>
>
>    4.9. Interfaces:
>
>         All interfaces provided by the 4.2 software will be deleted. See Appendix A
> 	for full list.
>  
>    4.10. Security Impact:
>
>         No impact.
>     
>
> 5. Reference Documents:
>
>        Berkeley DB Public Websites:
>
>           http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/berkeley-db/index.html
>  
>
>        Berkeley DB 4.7.25 Release Notes:
>
>           http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/changelog/4.7.html
>
>   
>        References:
>
>            [1] ./pkgmaps.txt
>
>  
> 6. Resources and Schedule:
>
>    6.1. Projected Availability:
>
>         This project will be included in Nevada.
>
> 	This project will not be included in S10, note S10 include BDB 4.2 but not 4.7.
> 	
> 	This project will not be included in OpenSolaris.
>  
>    6.2. Cost of Effort:
>
>         Minimal; just removal of a component within packages.
>
>    6.3. Cost of Capital Resources:
> 	
>         None.
>
>    	6.4.1. Consolidation or Component Name:
>
> 		ON
>
> 	6.4.3. Type of CPT Review and Approval expected:
>
> 		FastTrack
>
>         6.4.4. Project Boundary Conditions:
>
> 		N/A
>
> 	6.4.5. Is this a necessary project for OEM agreements:
>
>                No
>
>
>    6.5. ARC review type:
>
>         FastTrack
>
>  
>
> 7. Prototype Availability:
>
>    7.1. Prototype Availability:
> 	
>  	BDB 4.7.25 binaries are available to test.
>
>
>    7.2. Prototype Cost:
> 	
>         Minimal.
>
>
> Appendix A
>
>         FULL LIST of EXPORTED INTERFACES in BDB 4.2.52:
>
>                             Proposed        Former Stability
>         Interface           Stability       Classification
>         Name                Classification  and Other Comments
>         ------------------  -------------   ----------------------------------
>         C API		    Obsolete	    Formerly External, Removed in a 
>                  	    Volatile	    Minor release of Solaris
>         C++ API		    Obsolete	    Formerly External, Removed in a 
>                  	    Volatile	    Minor release of Solaris
>         Java API	    Obsolete	    Formerly External, Removed in a 
>                  	    Volatile	    Minor release of Solaris
>         TCL API	    	    Obsolete	    Formerly External, Removed in a 
>                  	    Volatile	    Minor release of Solaris
>         DB_HOME env    	    Obsolete	    Formerly External, Removed in a 
>         Variable	    Volatile	    Minor release of Solaris
>        					    Used to configure the
>                                             location of db files.
>                                                         
>         DB_CONFIG           Obsolete	    Formerly External, Removed in a 
>         config file	    Volatile	    Minor release of Solaris
>        					    Used to configure a
>                                             database
>                                                         
>         database file       Obsolete	    Removed in a Minor release of Solaris
> 			    Project Private               
>         transaction log     Obsolete        Removed in a Minor release of Solaris
>                             Project Private               
>         temporary backing   Obsolete        Removed in a Minor release of Solaris
>         files               Project Private               
>
>         db_archive          Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_checkpoint       Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_deadlock         Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_dump             Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_load             Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_printlog         Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_recover          Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_stat             Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_upgrade          Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>         db_verify           Obsolete	    Formerly Unstable, Removed in a
> 			    Uncommitted     minor release of Solaris
>   
>   




More information about the opensolaris-arc mailing list