20 Questions # 5 update [PSARC/2009/179 FastTrack timeout 03/25/2009]

[James Carlson]

Gary Winiger writes:
> +   See also PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris
> 
> +   http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2002/762
> 
> 	Specifically to John's thoughtful comments, yes, projects
> 	can always ignore a question from ignorance and adding labeled
> 	security to the list of unintended consequences doesn't really
> 	change that.  The previous for of question 5 presupposed
> 	understanding of a number of other security concepts.  Case owners
> 	are ultimately responsible for helping/guiding projects
> 	understanding.
> 
> Gary..
> P.S.	When the case log comes back on line, 2002/762 should be
> 	viewable.  I've redacted it.

That link is actually now:

  http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2002/762/

Note that it's on a different host, and it works differently than it
did in the past.  The materials appear to be present and complete.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677