[Fwd: Re: Drools [LSARC/2008/748 FastTrack timeout 05/05/2009]]

[margot]

Charles,

Looking at the below interface table, drools-ant-4.7.jar
makes sense as a project private jar file.

But drools-analytics-4.7.jar is marked project private
but then all the API's are marked uncommitted.  That
is a conflict.

      drools-analytics-4.7.jar                Project Private jar file
        location: /usr/share/lib/java
            * AnalyticsData                     uncommitted     interface
            * AnalysisResult                    uncommitted     interface
            * Cause                             uncommitted     interface
            * RangeCheckCause                   uncommitted     interface
            * Possibility                       uncommitted     interface

        drools-ant-4.7.jar                      Project Private jar file
        location: /usr/share/lib/java

Thanks,
Margot


Charles Binford wrote:
> Resend, this time including LSARC-ext.
> cb
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: Drools [LSARC/2008/748 FastTrack timeout 05/05/2009]
> From:
> Charles Binford <Charles.Binford at Sun.COM>
> Date:
> Tue, 19 May 2009 09:56:30 -0500
> To:
> Margot Miller <Margot.Miller at Sun.COM>
>
> To:
> Margot Miller <Margot.Miller at Sun.COM>
> CC:
> Richard.Matthews at Sun.COM, Mark Carlson <Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM>, Holly 
> Vergara <Holly.Costanza at Sun.COM>
>
>
> Our commitment level is project private.  I've attached  updated files 
> and diffs so it is easy to tell what changed.
>
> cb
>
>
> Margot Miller wrote:
>> What is your commitment level for your jar files?  Can any project
>> outside yours use them?  If not, then they should be project private.
>> And then the answer is no for the first question and the rest are
>> skipped.
>> The focus of these questions is on what you are exporting, not
>> importing.
>>
>> So if you are not publicly exporting anything, than mark it no
>> and skip the rest.
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>>
>> thanks
>> Margot
>>
>>
>> Rick Matthews wrote:
>>> Mark and Margot,
>>>  I'm a bit confused by these questions. Its likely because of lack 
>>> of context.
>>> I'll provide further detail (to be verified by Charles) to hopefully 
>>> steer us
>>> toward the correct answers.
>>>
>>> ++
>>> ++    3.1.2 Share and Sharable
>>> ++      Does the module include any components that are used or 
>>> shared by
>>> ++      other projects?
>>> ++      [ ] Yes
>>> ++      [x] No
>>> This project consumes jar files from other FOSS cases, both within 
>>> the context of
>>> Drools, and outside of that context (done by a different project 
>>> team). This project
>>> does not export anything other than the Drools business rules 
>>> engine. So, no components
>>> are exported for sharing.
>>> ++
>>> ++      If yes are these components packaged to be shared with the 
>>> other FOSS?
>>> ++      [x] Yes
>>> ++      [ ] No - ARC review required
>>> ++      [ ] N/A
>>> Based on the "no" above, this question should be skipped. If the 
>>> "shared" imported
>>> components are the ones in question, than the "yes" answer stands.
>>> ++
>>> ++      Are these components already in the Solaris WOS?
>>> ++      [ ] Yes
>>> ++      [x] No - continue with next section (section 3.2)
>>> Again, if the imported components are the ones in question, some are 
>>> in Solaris
>>> already, others are in progress as result of this case and other 
>>> fast tracks.
>>> ++
>>> ++      If yes are these newer versions being delivered?
>>> ++      [ ] Yes
>>> ++      [ ] No - ARC review required
>>> ++
>>> ++      If yes are the newer versions replacing the existing versions?
>>> ++      [ ] Yes
>>> ++      [ ] No - ARC review required
>>> ++
>>>
>>