MII & GMII Common Layer [PSARC/2009/319 FastTrack timeout 06/01/2009]
James Carlson
james.d.carlson at sun.com
Tue May 26 09:25:45 PDT 2009
Garrett D'Amore writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Ah, ok. As long as none of the registers can ever legitimately have
> > 0xffff in them, I guess it's ok.
> >
>
> Well, I suppose some register *could*, but I've yet to see it. The spec
> say that unimplemented registers should return this value.
Good point; that does it.
> >> Drivers that have PPA == ddi_get_instance() may just supply 0 for the
> >> instance.
> >>
> >
> > So you can't override and specify (otherwise legal) instance 0?
> >
>
> No. I've never seen a situation where this was desireable. Every case
> I've ever seen only has PPA zero when ddi_get_instance() is also zero.
That's weird, but ok ...
> That said, I'm thinking that a better way to do this might be to use an
> allocator for the mac_ops as you originally suggested, and then supply
> an instance number there. Then I could initialize to -1 and thereby
> shield drivers from even knowing about this if they don't need it.
Yep; that's a possibility.
> The problem with that approach is that it adds additional complexity to
> the driver's attach routine, because it has to free the structure as well.
>
> Its probably worth it though.
Yes, that part's a little annoying. Fortunately, we do it in many
places now.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
More information about the opensolaris-arc
mailing list