Delivering ksh93 through SFWNV instead of OS/Net ? / was: Re: Update Perl to version 5.10.x [PSARC/2009/315 FastTrack timeout06/02/2009]

[James Carlson]

Roland Mainz writes:
> Erm... why is the ksh93-integration project dragged into this discussion
> and why is this particular topic dragged out of it's grave (again
> (anyone remeber the "Cadaver Synod" [1] ? =:-) )) ?

It's here just to make the point that the distinction between ON and
SFW is in build rules, and not in quality.

In other words, we didn't choose to put ksh93 into ON because it would
have suffered from poor quality had it gone into SFW.  Thus, the
previous poster's contention is simply wrong.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677