[osol-mktg] OpenSolaris Developers Conf

[Laura Ramsey]

Jim:
thanks for highlighting a few important aspects--

The OpenSolaris developers would be a featured audience at the Sun W 
developer conference event. We'd have a seperate track dedicated to 
opensolaris community development issues. And, if it makes sense, we 
could have your engineering summit the day previous...as the pure 
oxygen...so these folks are also able to participate in the other half 
of the conference if they'd like.

Whether the conference will be run by O'Reilly or not, we're just 
starting those discussions. Simon introduced me to Nat T. (very cool 
guy) and he suggested that I put some really high PSI on scoping out the 
event, before we have formal discussions with O'Reilly. Also, if this 
conference expands to become a large SunW hosted / sponsored / fronted 
event, the scope would change a bit, and we'd hope to influence it so it 
went the way you suggest--as a conference of communities.  So we're 
pulling together the RFP for the conference now.

OpenSolaris community is absolutely a stakeholder. Thanks for 
highlighting that! I didn't want to volunteer you for anything--and 
won't until we have the scope down and you're comfortable with how it's 
coming together.

See Simon's email next in the queue. He's got it really nailed down 
nicely. Like his thinking!
LKR



Jim Grisanzio wrote:

> Thanks for this, Laura. Some comments below. -- Jim
>
> Laura Ramsey wrote:
>
>>
>> Glenn, Keith, Rich, Jim and Jorg:
>>
>> Great comments all. You have all touched on the same questions in my 
>> mind.
>>
>> This is A LONG email--here's what is covered for readers on the go:
>>
>> --Update-- on conference development--SunW is interested and looking 
>> into it...
>>
>> --Hot Seat--Answers to Keith's questions--They are Good ones (both 
>> the questions and answers)
>>
>> --Next Steps--A preview into what roles and time commitment necessary 
>> for building the RIGHT conference!
>>
>> Here we go!
>> LKR
>> x66750
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --UPDATE--
>> ==========
>>
>> After the last week of pinging around other "stakeholders" in a 
>> Developer Conference hosted by Sun, I've learned a few more things:
>>
>> 1--
>> Corporate marketing (Let's refer to this group as SunW --W stands for 
>> Wallet in this case!) is actively discussing hosting a user 
>> conference in the near term (before JavaOne 2006) .  
>
>
>
> A user conference specifically for OpenSolaris, I assume, right? Is 
> this a Sun-run event like SunNetwork? Or are we planning to have a 
> neutral 3rd party, such as O'Reilly or someone, manage the conference 
> for us?
>
>
>> Stakeholders are of course the
>> Solaris Marketing Team, the Sun Developer Network team (tools, 
>> portions of Open Source program office --Jini, JXTA, GlassFish) and 
>> the OpenSolaris team.  
>
>
>
> So, that sounds like a "Sun" user conference, not an "OpenSolaris" user
> or developer conference specifically. Does corporate intend to get all 
> the communities together for some sort of Sun "community" conference? 
> That might be a cool thing to do if the communities are involved in 
> the planning.
>
> Also, do you mean the OpenSolaris "community" here when you say
> "OpenSolaris team"? The OpenSolaris community is an equal stakeholder 
> in this with the internal team. As is the CAB, so we need to bring 
> them in to this thread at some point.
>
>
>> I am joining this effort to ensure OpenSolaris has
>> outstanding visibility and contribution to both the design of such a 
>> conference and participation if it should occur. Interesting to note, 
>> these discussions are held periodically and decision for a SunW level 
>> conference is not always the result--Kinda like standards efforts at 
>> OASIS...(boo, bad  joke, sorry)  This would be the Extravaganza 
>> approach (User/Business) and we could host the hard core Developer 
>> track within this setting.
>>
>> 2--
>> I think we're all orbitting around the idea of Developer, lots of 
>> planning sessions, not too many signs...etc.  vs. the Extravaganza  
>> approach...
>
>
>
> Good. The more focused on developers the better. I have no interest in 
> "extravaganzas" to be honest. :) I don't think the OpenSolaris 
> community is big enough to support an extravaganza at this early date. 
> Remember, there will be many types of conferences and gatherings that 
> will grow as OpenSolaris grows. I think what you are talking about 
> here (if corp was not involved) is a general OpenSolaris developer 
> conference. I think that's great. I'll surely go and help out and all 
> that. I'm also planning (as I briefly outlined in my original response 
> to this thread, but is not included here) an engineering summit that 
> is much different. We need both (and more).
>
>> note: that's the approach that SunW would go for. Interesting
>> to note that if we build the content for option 2, then we have our 
>> stuff together and can roll regardless of SunW's plans...which is a 
>> great way to go. See "next steps" below....
>>
>> --HOT SEAT--
>> ===========
>>
>> So, earlier on the thread Keith asked excellent questions--you'll be 
>> interested in the answers because it notes the sheer numbers and 
>> power behind the SunW "Machine", and it begins to answer the mystery 
>> of "why would marketing care?"...
>>
>>
>> Regarding the Bleeding edge approach--combining Solaris development 
>> and opensolaris content--extending into User base...Keith asks..
>>
>> Q: "On what have you based your estimate of 2500-5000 participants?  
>> Even
>> if admission were free, it seems unlikely that 40% or more of the
>> people who've registered would spend the travel money needed to
>> attend.  This is especially true given that the number of people who
>> have actually contributed code or even posted to mailing lists is a
>> small fraction of that number."
>>
>> A: I was surprised too. And alittle worried that we'd have big 
>> expectations. But, Funny enough, these estimates are based on the 
>> number of the attendees at the SunNetWork conference in September of 
>> 2002 --those registerants that checked off the boxes for Solaris 
>> developer/adminstration as their field of interest.  Having said 
>> that, I'd probably take out 20% because SunNetwork had alot of Oracle 
>> and BEA marketing dollars invested that this go around might not be 
>> there. Also, Sun's first Solaris developer conference in 1991 had 
>> 2,300 attendees. We had to turn away folks at the door because the 
>> Fairmont in SJ was busting at the seams. My sense is that if we could 
>> rally that many in 1991, we can probably match those numbers today. 
>> HOWEVER, Glenn's comments are not going unheard--and I agree. If we 
>> cut the crowd in half (600-1,200) we can have a more focused agenda.
>
>
> I agree. The number is not as important as the content is. The numbers 
> companies toss around at conferences are, well, questionable at best. 
> Stay small, stay focused, stay honest.
>
>
>> (COMMS Chaos Theory 2--content focus is diluted by diversity of 
>> topics as dictated by number of attendees)
>>
>>
>> Regarding the Pure Oxygen developer conf OpenMic approach--Keith 
>> asks....
>>
>> Q:  "I'd be interested to know whether your organisation (ed: 
>> marketing) would have any
>> interest in (2a) at all, since it's fundamentally an engineering forum
>> and would offer little in the way of marketing opportunities (all the
>> attendees would be existing contributors)."
>>
>> A: After attending OSCON, I have more interest in this format than 
>> ever. From a community building standpoint, it would be 
>> outstanding--and facilitating community building and the care and 
>> communication to the community is one of the OSMarketing team's main 
>> duties. So, having this targetted approach, as long as it is 
>> interesting to the OpenSolaris developer community, We want it.
>> One thing I like about the Pure Oxygen approach is that you guys will 
>> get some really solid inbound information from the 
>> participants--rather than the group just "talking to" attendees like 
>> we did at OSCON, we might even get some folks Giving US something!  
>> That would be awesome.
>
>
> A developer conference (like what OSCON is) is one thing, but a small 
> OpenSolaris kernel engineering summit involving the project's core 
> contributors who already know each other and work together is another 
> thing entirely. There's no need to mix the two events; in fact, they 
> are better considered separately.
>
> It sounds like O'Reilly is the model for this general developer 
> conference, which is fine. I can certainly support that.
>
>
>> The other thing I like about this approach is--if we plan it, we can 
>> execute WITH OR WITHOUT SUNW contribution, either as a track in their 
>> extravaganza if that's the way things evolve, or if they decide they 
>> don't want to do a big conference, we can go it alone.  Either way we 
>> win. (COMMS Chaos Theory 6--He who has the most compelling content wins)
>>
>>
>> ---NEXT STEPS--
>> ===============
>>
>> 1--Continued discussion and Lively Debate on content/venue/format
>>
>> 2--Continued updates (I'll keep them shorter in the future)
>>
>> 3--Core Team formation.  It's time to get together a core team of 
>> folks who can advise and assist in this effort. Volunteers would be 
>> great. Here's the roles we'll need filled:
>>
>>     1--CONTENT CHAIR
>>         -review of presentation abstract submissions and Selection
>>         -review of proceedings materials for distribution at conference
>>         --Liason to engineering content/efforts of Solaris, BigAdmin, 
>> SDN etc...
>>            2--PROMOTION/COMMUNICATION CHAIR--(Claire Giordano)
>>         -Classic marketing activities to promote the show (ads, etc)
>>         -Shot glasses with blue sparks, Beer, Pizza
>>         -Signage, look and feel and production of proceedings
>>         -Liason to SunW promotion/communication efforts w/ Solaris, 
>> Open source Programs, corporate
>>
>>     3--LOGISTICS CHAIR--(Likely a SunW representative here--LKR 
>> looking into it)
>>
>>
>>     4--WEBSITE CHAIR--(TBD)
>>         -the enduring collection of the proceedings on the web--
>>         -Packaging the content for Int'l Roadshow throughout the fall--
>
>
>
> I'd suggest a "Community Chair" here, too. A non-Sun person, though. 
> The community -- OpenSolaris in this case -- should be represented in 
> the planning of the conference. They should have the option of 
> involvement, anyway, since many of them are honestly interested in 
> participating on marketing activities.
>
>
>> In the beginning, the time commitment will be about 1 hour a week--to 
>> read updates (sorry this one is so damned long) and to comment and 
>> start collecting ideas for content.
>>
>> Time commitment will really begin to become heavy once we have 
>> submissions to review, and promotions to start up. Time commitment 
>> will be not quite as heavy as the launch, but pretty heavy (20 hours 
>> a week for some, 60 hours for others!)
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> LKR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Glynn Foster wrote:
>>
>>> Heya,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Our challenge will be to keep the format in line with You guy's 
>>>> (bad grammar!) line of thought, or that fantastic Linux agenda 
>>>> Glynn forwarded around...and resisting the overwhelming urge to 
>>>> reincarnate the SunNetWork extravaganza.
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So having read some of the replies, Keith basically highlights the
>>> potential conflict of interest in any approach taken -
>>>         o Developer - lots of planning sessions, few if any talks
>>>       and keynotes. Useful for developers getting their job
>>>       done and contributing to OpenSolaris.org
>>>
>>>       Could potentially expand to anyone involved in opensolaris.org
>>>       - discussions about how to marketing opensolaris.org, various
>>>       communities [smf, tools, desktop, xorg, ...] each having
>>>       mini-sections.
>>>
>>>             vs
>>>
>>>     o User/Business - This is probably your extravaganza marketing
>>>       conference. A really good opportunity to have some highly
>>>       technical *user* focused talks, highlighting the technology
>>>       involved
>>>
>>> You generally have to get this right, and separate the two, so the
>>> developers can't get distracted and actually get some useful stuff
>>> discussed, rather than the usual 'Why can't the default shell be bash?'
>>> type of arguments ;)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Couple of interesting ways to go--what's your reaction?
>>>>
>>>> 1--Solaris/OpenSolaris  Developer Conference--BLEEDING EDGE Solaris 
>>>> based technologies from developers, venue aimed at the higher end 
>>>> advanced developer, focus on Solaris / OpenSolaris development 
>>>> issues.   2-3-days--keynotes at a minimum...Tutorials, hands on 
>>>> sessions, and BoFs would be the sweetspot of the agenda. (Like 
>>>> Glynn's example from australia...so cool!)  With this scope, we 
>>>> could expect to draw at least 2,500 attendees, and if we opened the 
>>>> event up to sponsorships and coordinated promotions, we could get 
>>>> as many as 5,000.  Registration fees would be minimal (Cost of 
>>>> event/production)
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is probably my preference. But cut down your numbers by more than
>>> half and we're probably in the right direction. Depends on the above
>>> decision - developer or user/business? or both? If both, then you 
>>> want a
>>> very, very clear separation of the conference - with the developers
>>> being able to do their thing for the first day or two alone :)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> 1a--Hosting the above format as a feature track at JavaOne, or 
>>>> ETech, or OSCON (Note--that means waiting a long time to hold this 
>>>> event!)
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bleh - it makes no sense to hold this at JavaOne. Completely unrelated.
>>> I don't know about ETech, but OSCON seems big enough already.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> 2--"Open Mic" Developer Conference--venue aimed at Open Source 
>>>> developers only. Showcase all Sun's open source projects, featuring 
>>>> OpenSolaris and Solaris development issues. 2-days--keynotes at a 
>>>> minimum...tutorials, hands on sessions and BoFs would be sweetspot 
>>>> of the agenda. (Like Glynn's example from australia...) With this 
>>>> scope, we could probably expect to draw 1,500 attendees, and if we 
>>>> opened the event up to sponsorships and coordinated promotions, we 
>>>> could get as many as 2,000. NOTE--THIS COULD BE A FREE EVENT TO BE 
>>>> REALLY COMPELLING!
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Then it probably wouldn't be a developers conference anymore. By
>>> developer, I mean the people actually contributing kernel code. It 
>>> would
>>> be a more user/developer conference if that makes any sense at all :/
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> 2a--hosting the above format as a Solaris kernel "pure oxygen" 
>>>> approach like Jim has suggested  (No Signs, lots of code!)
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That's probably something that's more useful to talk about right 
>>> now, or
>>> at least coming up with a conference plan that includes a very much 
>>> sand
>>> boxed kernel dev pre-conference session.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Timing:  Early March 2006 (so we don't collide with  JavaOne 
>>>> juggernaut...)
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds rocking to me ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Glynn
>>
>


_______________________________________________
opensolaris-mktg mailing list
opensolaris-mktg at opensolaris.org