[osol-mktg] Sponsor Project Indiana

Patrick Finch Patrick.Finch at Sun.COM
Thu Jun 14 02:01:14 PDT 2007


Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Stephen Lau wrote:
>>
>>> Patrick Finch wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some confusion for some people perhaps, but it is possible to 
>>>> communicate a change.  For the last 2 years I have been dealing with 
>>>> the confusion that "OpenSolaris" is not a bootable OS.
>>>>
>>>> I can understand that there might be objections to naming a distro 
>>>> "OpenSolaris" for other reasons, but I don't accept that the risk of 
>>>> confusing people should disqualify the idea.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well it depends.  There seems to be a disconnect across the Sun 
>>> corporation as to *what* OpenSolaris is... 
>>
>>
>> Which is why I keep seeing banner ads that say "Solaris 10: Free and
>> Open Source" that Sun buys on various websites to add to the confusion.
> 
> 
>  From a communications perspective, explaining OpenSolaris is extremely 
> challenging when you consider all the diverse audiences around the 
> world: customers and partners, competitors, governments, press and 
> analysts, developers, administrators, users, university 
> students/professors, etc. The fact that Sun keeps saying that "Solaris" 
> is open source doesn't help, but I can really sympathize with that since 
> in some markets it actually makes good sense to position the product 
> that way.

It does, and am guilty of this sometimes, as Sun's competitors continue 
to position Solaris as entirely proprietary.

> Whenever I talk to people I always say that Solaris is Sun's supported 
> binary product. It's closed. OpenSolaris is a subset of the source code 
> for Solaris. It's open. At that level it's not confusing at all. It gets 
> confusing when we try to make it out to be more than it is and explain 
> all that across all audiences in all markets simultaneously. If Indy can 
> solve that problem, cool. I'm all for it. I doubt that it can in the 
> short term, though. I think this will take years to clear up, and I 
> don't see any problem with that whatsoever.

Yes, that is very a good way to clarify what OpenSolaris is.  Beyond the 
semantic challenge though, there are a lot of people out there who are 
interested in trying this technology out, and are looking for a 
community: if I try a Linux distro I look to its community for help.

The message we risk giving to potential users is that the OpenSolaris 
community is not the place for them.

Patrick







More information about the opensolaris-mktg mailing list