[website-discuss] [ogb-discuss] Project/Community EOL procedures? (was Re: spam in the forums...)

[Simon Phipps]

On May 27, 2009, at 19:20, Elaine Ashton wrote:

> Perhaps the OGB should consider appointing an archivist, preferrably  
> someone with some interest and experience in archiving to help shape  
> the policy.

I've not seen anything so far to persuade me that the OGB ought to  
intervene. Archiving historical work should be a routine part of the  
work of the Website Community Group, and un-doing the un-used (a  
different job to archiving what is no longer current) sounds non- 
controversial.

Is there a reason this is being referred to the OGB rather than just  
handled where it belongs in the Website CG?

Thanks

S.